Back to topics

Coded names can still be personal data

Removing names from a dataset does not necessarily make the people in it unidentifiable. In the Irish and EU data-protection context, codes and other available information can leave a connection to individuals, which matters when distinguishing pseudonymization from anonymization.

4–5 min

Questions you could explore

  • What information could preserve a link between a code and a person?
  • Why does identifiability depend on the surrounding context?

Start reading

Ready to try your ideas aloud?

Your topic carries over. Record up to 2½ minutes, depending on your plan.

Who reviews a refused Irish freedom-of-information request?

Law and rights4–5 minAn ordinary Irish FOI request begins with the public body holding the records. A refusal can lead to internal review and then review by the Information Commissioner, although exceptions affect the usual route.

Law and rights

Who decides what in an Irish criminal jury trial?

The judge and jury share a courtroom while answering different questions. In the Irish jury-trial example, the judge directs on law, the jury reaches a verdict from the evidence, and sentencing after a guilty verdict belongs to the judge.

3–5 min

Who decides what in an Irish criminal jury trial?

Law and rights3–5 minThe judge and jury share a courtroom while answering different questions. In the Irish jury-trial example, the judge directs on law, the jury reaches a verdict from the evidence, and sentencing after a guilty verdict belongs to the judge.

Why does EU legislation come as both regulations and directives?

Law and rights3–5 minEU legal acts can set common rules in different ways. A regulation applies across the EU, while a directive sets a result for the countries addressed to achieve through national measures.

Coded names can still be personal data | Speech Topic | speaking.app