Back to topics

Who should answer for a harmful automated-vehicle decision?

In a fictional incident, an automated vehicle harms someone after a chain of decisions about design, testing, deployment, and supervision. Identifying the immediate cause does not by itself decide who should explain the failure or put it right. Legal liability is another question and requires the facts and law of a particular jurisdiction.

3–7 min

Questions you could explore

  • Which actors had the information and authority to prevent the harm?
  • How could responsibility be shared without becoming nobody’s responsibility?

Start reading

Ready to try your ideas aloud?

Your topic carries over. Record up to 2½ minutes, depending on your plan.

Ethics and philosophy

When does a conclusion follow, and when is it a prediction?

A rule can tell you what must follow if its premises are true. A pattern in observations can suggest what you may find next. Deduction and induction make these different kinds of move: a valid deduction still needs true premises, while further observations can overturn an inductive generalization.

3–5 min

When does a conclusion follow, and when is it a prediction?

Ethics and philosophy3–5 minA rule can tell you what must follow if its premises are true. A pattern in observations can suggest what you may find next. Deduction and induction make these different kinds of move: a valid deduction still needs true premises, while further observations can overturn an inductive generalization.

Ethics and philosophy

Why can two trolley dilemmas feel so different?

Two imagined choices can save the same number of people yet feel morally different. Redirecting a runaway trolley and using a person to stop it raise questions about intentions, duties, and whether a good result can justify the means.

3–7 min

Why can two trolley dilemmas feel so different?

Ethics and philosophy3–7 minTwo imagined choices can save the same number of people yet feel morally different. Redirecting a runaway trolley and using a person to stop it raise questions about intentions, duties, and whether a good result can justify the means.

Ethics and philosophy

Is the red you see the same red that I see?

We can agree that a tomato is red and choose the same matching paint. Does that agreement show that red feels the same to each of us? The puzzle separates what we can compare publicly from what another person’s experience is like.

4–6 min

Is the red you see the same red that I see?

Ethics and philosophy4–6 minWe can agree that a tomato is red and choose the same matching paint. Does that agreement show that red feels the same to each of us? The puzzle separates what we can compare publicly from what another person’s experience is like.

Who should answer for a harmful automated-vehicle decision? | Speech Topic | speaking.app