Back to topics

What makes a research review more than a reading list?

A systematic review sets out how studies are found, selected, and assessed before drawing them together. The method makes the route to a conclusion inspectable, while differences among studies can still limit what their combined evidence means.

3–7 min

Questions you could explore

  • How could selection rules change the answer?
  • When is a numerical meta-analysis useful, and when might it be inappropriate?

Start reading

Ready to try your ideas aloud?

Your topic carries over. Record up to 2½ minutes, depending on your plan.

Media and information

What makes a historical source primary?

A diary and a history book stand in different relationships to the past, but neither is automatically beyond question. What counts as a primary source also depends on what you are trying to find out.

3–5 min
Media and information

Following a web claim back to its source

Five webpages repeating the same claim may lead back to one original report. Lateral reading looks beyond an unfamiliar page to investigate its publisher; following links upstream helps reveal where the evidence began.

8–10 min
Media and information

What can a photo’s metadata actually prove?

An image file may carry a date, camera information, or a caption alongside its pixels. Those details can be useful clues, but some can be changed or removed as a file is edited and shared.

4–5 min
What makes a research review more than a reading list? | Speech Topic | speaking.app