Back to topics

Following a web claim back to its source

Five webpages repeating the same claim may lead back to one original report. Lateral reading looks beyond an unfamiliar page to investigate its publisher; following links upstream helps reveal where the evidence began.

8–10 min

Questions you could explore

  • What can other sources reveal about who published a webpage?
  • Do several reports add new evidence or repeat the same original source?
  • What remains uncertain after a claim has been traced to its origin?

Start reading

Ready to try your ideas aloud?

Your topic carries over. Record up to 2½ minutes, depending on your plan.

Media and information

What makes a historical source primary?

A diary and a history book stand in different relationships to the past, but neither is automatically beyond question. What counts as a primary source also depends on what you are trying to find out.

3–5 min
Media and information

What can a photo’s metadata actually prove?

An image file may carry a date, camera information, or a caption alongside its pixels. Those details can be useful clues, but some can be changed or removed as a file is edited and shared.

4–5 min
Media and information

When should a scientific paper be corrected or retracted?

A published paper can acquire a notice explaining that something was wrong. The question is whether the problem can be corrected while the findings remain usable, or whether readers should stop relying on them.

4–5 min
Following a web claim back to its source | Speech Topic | speaking.app