Can two sides agree while disagreeing about what will happen?
A fictional client expects a project to attract many users; its supplier is less certain. They could make part of the payment depend on a specified outcome rather than settle the forecast first. The arrangement creates a new question: what exactly will be measured, by whom, and under which conditions?
Questions you could explore
- Could either party influence the measurement in a way the other would consider unfair?
- What should happen if the outcome cannot be measured as planned?
Start reading
- www.pon.harvard.eduHarvard PON: contingency contracts
Explains the idea of making a term depend on an outcome. The examples are historical; a fictional case keeps the focus on clear measurement.
Ready to try your ideas aloud?
Your topic carries over. Record up to 2½ minutes, depending on your plan.